Sustainability Notes
The sustainability notes provide comprehensive information on Belimo's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance indicators disclosed in this report. They include definitions, applied methodologies, assumptions and, if applicable, restatements.
We aim to maintain consistency in the definition and calculation of sustainability metrics over time. However, adjustments may occur to better align with strategic objectives or evolving industry standards. In such cases, or when material prior-year errors are identified, comparative figures will be restated. Restatement thresholds are assessed individually, considering the overall impact on the report. Any significant restatements are explained in the respective sustainability sections.
A base year recalculation is required when changes in GHG accounting methodology, divestments, acquisitions, or corrections of prior calculation errors result in a material deviation of at least 5% in reported emissions. For the current reporting period 2025, no base year recalculation was necessary.
The sustainability reporting period aligns with the financial reporting period, covering January 1 to December 31, 2025 for BELIMO Holding AG and all subsidiaries. Belimo discloses its non-financial information on sustainability annually.
Double Materiality Assessment
Background
In 2024, Belimo updated its materiality assessment methodology in line with the requirements of the European Union's CSRD and ESRS. The double materiality assessment (DMA) conducted for the first time helped to define the sustainability topics that are material for Belimo’s business and its stakeholders.
The DMA framework recognizes that materiality encompasses both financial (outside-in) risks and opportunities and environmental and social (inside-out) impacts. While financial materiality considers risks and opportunities that may affect the Company financially, impact materiality focuses on how Belimo’s activities affect the environment and society. The assessment encompasses Belimo's operations and its entire value chain. Stakeholder engagement was integral to the process, ensuring a balanced approach.
To ensure alignment between the sustainability strategy, reporting standards and stakeholder and regulatory expectations, Belimo will regularly review its double materiality assessment and the list of material sustainability topics. The applicability is revised on a regular basis. While not all material topics are addressed with the same level of maturity, Belimo is actively advancing on its sustainability program to systematically address these topics over time.
Stakeholder Engagement
Internal and external stakeholders were involved in the process of quantifying and scoring the impacts, risks, and opportunities. The senior management (Group Executive Committee and the Extended Executive Committee) was interviewed and highlighted important topics for the longlist. Internal workshops and external interviews were conducted to quantify the potential material issues and to assess the impacts, risks and opportunities. The internal workshops were held across different functions, business lines, and hierarchy levels. Interviews with external stakeholders included customers, suppliers, the financial community, academia, and associations. The senior management approved the outcome of the DMA as the 13 key sustainability topics.
Methodology
The following methodology for assessing double materiality was applied:
- Business model analysis, desk research and value chain analysis to derive a longlist of potentially material topics (approx. 450 topics);
- Shortening longlist to shortlist of potentially material topics (22 topics);
- Identification of impacts, risks, and opportunities (IROs);
- Validation and evaluation of potentially relevant material topics from an inside-out perspective (impact materiality) and outside-in perspective (financial materiality) through stakeholder engagement activities, including external interviews and internal business impact workshops;
- Threshold setting to define which topics should be considered as material (13 topics);
- Validation and approval of material topics by senior management.
Financial Risks and Opportunities
Financial risks and opportunities were assessed based on likelihood and (potential) magnitude of financial risk or opportunity.
Impacts
Impacts may be actual or potential, negative or positive, short-, medium-, or long-term, intended or unintended, and reversible or irreversible. "Actual" versus "potential" impact relates to the distinction between the impacts that have already occurred (actual impacts) versus the impacts that could occur under certain conditions or future scenarios (potential impacts). Belimo assessed scale, scope, irremediability, and likelihood of impacts. Scope, scale and irremediability of actual and potential negative impacts define the severity of an impact. For positive impacts, irremediability and severity is inherently not applicable.
Threshold Setting
The materiality threshold for actual positive impacts was determined based on the combined scores for scale and scope. For potential positive impacts, the threshold was set according to the likelihood of occurrence, in addition to the combined scale and scope scores.
The materiality threshold for actual negative impacts was set on the severity score (sum of scale, scope, irremediability). For potential negative impacts, the threshold was set according to the likelihood of occurrence, in addition to the severity scoring.
The materiality thresholds for financial risks and opportunities were set on the likelihood of occurrence and the magnitude of financial effects.
Overview of material topics to be checked against Annual Report 2024
Overview of material topics to be checked against Annual Report 2024
Topic | Impacts | Risks | Opportunities | Value Chain | Time Horizon | Link to ESRS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Climate Change | Impact environment through product design, optimized energy consumption in use-phase, material extraction/ transport, and manufacturing processes. | Risk of not meeting eco-design standards. Risk of lack of transparency. Failure to achieve climate targets. | Lead in energy-efficient HVAC solutions. Increase revenue from sustainable products. Achieve operational cost savings for efficient HVAC solutions. | Entire value chain | Short-, Medium-, Long-term | E1 Climate change (Energy, Climate change adaptation, Climate change mitigation) | ||||||
Energy Management | Impact through energy use in own operations contributing to GHG emissions. | Increase of energy costs. Limited energy availability. Stricter energy regulations. | Achieve operational cost savings through improved energy management. | Own operations | Short-, Medium-, Long-term | E1 Climate change (Energy) | ||||||
Contribution to Energy Efficiency | Reduce building energy use and emissions through sold products. | Risk of non-compliance with energy efficiency standards. Higher R&D and compliance costs. | Capitalize on growing market demand. Achieve sales growth from energy-saving products. | Downstream value chain | Short-, Medium-, Long-term | E1 Climate change (Energy, Climate change adaptation) | ||||||
Environmental Footprint of Supply Chain & Traceability | Environmental degradation through emissions and waste generated in supply chain. | Financial and reputational risks from unsustainable suppliers. Higher regulatory and compliance costs to achieve transparency. | Optimize supply chain for sustainability. Achieve Scope 3 emission reductions. Attract eco-conscious investors. | Upstream value chain | Medium-, Long-term | E1 Climate change (Climate change mitigation), E5 Resource use & circular economy (Resource inflows) | ||||||
Circular Economy | Poor traceability increases transport and purchased material emissions. | Higher costs due to eco-design implementation and R&D costs. | Achieve cost savings from waste reduction and resource efficiency. | Entire value chain | Medium-, Long-term | E5 Resource use & circular economy (Resource inflows, Resource outflows, Waste) | ||||||
Occupational Health, Safety & Wellbeing | Poor practices (accidents, hazardous material, stress) may harm employees' health and safety. | Risks associated with compensation claims, legal liabilities, fines, higher employee turnover, operational disruptions, and productivity loss. | Safe working environment leading to higher productivity, reduced absenteeism, lower employee turnover, and stronger reputation. | Own operations | Short-, Medium-term | S1 Own workforce (Working conditions; Health & Safety) |
Overview of material topics to be checked against Annual Report 2024
Topic | Impacts | Risks | Opportunities | Value Chain | Time Horizon | Link to ESRS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Talent Attraction, Development & Retention | Drive innovation in energy-efficient HVAC industry. Create job opportunities and support economic development. | High turnover leading to recruitment and training costs, operational disruption. Lack of skilled talent hinders innovation and reduces productivity. | Strong talent management improves productivity, customer satisfaction, attracts investors and enhances competitiveness. | Own operations | Medium-, Long-term | S1 Own workforce (Equal treatment and opportunities for all) | ||||||
Social Responsibility & Human Rights in the Supply Chain | Potential labor rights violations (incl. child labor, forced labor) in supply chain. | Risk of legal penalties, supply chain disruptions and reputational damage. | Build trust with stakeholders, attract ethical investors, and ensure stable supply. | Own operations, Upstream value chain | Medium-, Long-term | S2 Workers in the value chain (Working conditions) | ||||||
Occupants’ Health, Safety & Wellbeing | Poor performance of HVAC components may affect indoor air quality and occupants' health. | Risk of product recalls, legal liabilities, fines, and reputational damage. | Health-conscious and innovative products can boost sales and brand value. | Downstream value chain | Short-, Medium-, Long-term | S4 Consumers and end-users (Personal safety) | ||||||
Data Privacy & Cybersecurity | Sensitive information (e.g. employee, customer data) may be compromised and exposed. | Risk of operational disruptions, legal penalties, cost for remediation, and customer distrust | Maintain customer trust. Protect against breaches. | Entire value chain | Short-, Medium-term | G1 Business conduct | ||||||
Digitalization | Enables predictive maintenance, prevention of equipment failure. Enhances efficiency and maintenance. | Implementation failures may increase costs, operational disruptions. Falling behind reduces competitiveness. | Drive cost savings. Improve operational efficiency. Enhance product reliability. Strengthen market position. | Entire value chain | Short-, Medium-term | G1 Business conduct | ||||||
Innovation & Solution Leadership | Supports sustainability by delivering sustainable solutions. Advances industry standards. | Risk of falling behind in technology and losing market share. | Market expansion and revenue growth through innovation. | Upstream value chain, Downstream value chain | Medium-, Long-term | E1 Climate change, S4 Consumers and end-users, G1 Business conduct | ||||||
Product Quality, Safety & Compliance | Poor quality can harm customers, occupants' health and safety, and environment. | Risks include product recalls, legal costs, customer distrust and reputation loss. | Differentiation through high-quality, safety and reliability. | Entire value chain | Short-, Medium-, Long-term | S4 Consumers and end-users, G1 Business conduct |
Climate Change
Establishing a solid methodology for our Scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emission accounting helps Belimo improve sustainability transparency, identify carbon hotspots, and reduce emissions along the value chain. This document summarizes the methodology applied by Belimo to quantifying and annually reporting Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
Methodology
The methodology is aligned with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP) and the net zero guidelines IWA 42:2022 by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO; IWA42:2022). Belimo accounts for its GHG emissions in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (2004) and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (2011) (Corporate Standard | GHG Protocol; Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard | GHG Protocol).
Operational control approach (GRI 305-1 f, GRI 305-2 f)
An operational control approach is applied for the GHG emission calculation. Consequently, this undertaking is accountable for the emissions over which the organization has operational control. Scope 1 and 2 emissions cover all production, logistics and customization sites. Scope 3 emissions cover all entities in the group financial statement, except for Scope 3 Category 5, which covers all production, logistics and customization sites. Following this approach, the Company can ensure that more than 90% of the resource consumption and associated emissions are covered.
Reporting period
The GHG accounting is aligned with the financial reporting period of Belimo from January 1 to December 31. For Scope 3 Category 4 and 9 emissions, actual data from January to October is used and November / December emissions are estimated based on the YTD data available. The reason for this is the availability of data and extensive calculation methodology using the harmonized Global Logistics Emissions Council (GLEC) framework. The GLEC provides a standardized framework for reporting logistics emissions.
Market-based Scope 2 emissions (GRI 305-2 b)
Belimo procures Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) to account for renewable electricity consumption. RECs adhere to the specific standards that ensure integrity and reliability of reported market-based emissions. It is an exclusive claim (no double-counting). The RECs are based on actual generation data from renewable energy sources (hydropower and wind). The RECs are generated within the same market and geographic boundary and reporting period as the electricity consumption took place.
For Scope 1 and 2 climate targets, the market-based Scope 2 emissions are considered.
CO2 equivalents (GRI 305-1 b, GRI 305-2 c, GRI 305-3 b)
GHG emissions are reported in tCO2e and include all relevant gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, or all.)
Rationale for base year selection of climate targets (GRI 305-1 d, GRI 305-2 d, GRI 305-3 e)
For reasons of representativeness, 2022 was selected as the base year for both the Scope 1 and 2 as well as the Scope 3 climate targets.
Material emission categories (GRI 305-1 a, GRI 305-2 a, GRI 305-5 a, d)
The Company reports on Scope 1 and Scope 2 market-based and location-based emissions. The material Scope 3 categories cover over 90% of Scope 3 emissions (a requirement for climate targets in line with SBTi). The comprehensive GHG balance includes the following material Scope 3 categories:
Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 4: Upstream transport and distribution
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 11: Use of sold products
Category 12: End-of-Life treatment of sold products
Material emission categories
Scope / Category | Description | Control | Coverage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scope 1 | Direct emissions from owned or controlled sources | High | Low | |||
Scope 2 | Indirect emissions from purchased electricity, heating, and cooling | High | Low | |||
Scope 3 Category 1: Purchased goods and services | Upstream emissions (cradle-to-gate) of materials, articles, finished products, and packaging purchased by Belimo in the reporting year | High | High | |||
Scope 3 Category 4: Upstream transport and distribution | Upstream emissions from transportation and distribution purchased; inbound logistics, outbound logistics (e.g. of sold products), and intercompany transportation and distribution between owned facilities (vehicles not owned / controlled by Belimo) | High | Medium | |||
Scope 3 Category 5: Waste generated in operations | Emissions generated through the disposal and treatment of waste in the operations of Belimo in the reporting year | Medium | Low | |||
Scope 3 Category 6: Business travel | Emissions from employee travel for business activities (via air, rail, road) during the reporting year (in vehicles not owned / operated by Belimo) | High | Low | |||
Scope 3 Category 7: Employee commuting | Emissions from employees commuting between homes and worksites during the reporting period (in vehicles not owned / operated by Belimo) | Medium | Low | |||
Scope 3 Category 11: Use of sold products | Use-phase emissions from energy consumption of total products sold during the reporting period (lifetime of sold products) | Medium | Very High | |||
Scope 3 Category 12: End-of-Life treatment of sold products | Emissions generated from waste disposal and treatment of products sold (during reporting year) at end of life | Medium | Low |
Coverage of total scope 1–3 emissions
- Very high: > 80%
- High: > 10%–80%
- Medium: 1–10%
- Low: < 1%
Degree of control over scope 1–3 category
- High: Belimo has a large influence on emissions
- Medium: Belimo is limited to control emissions
- Low: Belimo is strongly limited to control emissions
Calculation Scope 3 Category 1
Belimo relies on an asset-light business model, outsourcing 88% of production costs to maintain flexibility and ensure the timely delivery of high-quality field services. The calculation of Scope 3 Category 1 upstream emissions of purchased goods and services (cradle-to-gate) is based on a material classification system and weight-based emission factor (EF) application. Purchased articles or finished products in the procurement report are allocated to main material and sub-material categories. The net weight of the article / finished product is required and taken from the procurement report. For each sub-material category, the EFs (kg CO2e / kg) are extracted from the lifecycle assessment (LCA) database ecoinvent. The latest EFs available were applied. When a specific sub-material category was unavailable in the LCA database, feasible proxies were chosen. Belimo is working with its suppliers to obtain supplier-specific data, but this is not taken into account in the methodology applied. Experts mapped sub-material categories, articles, and EFs to ensure data accuracy. For the emission calculation, the sub-material EFs in kg CO2e / kg are multiplied by the purchased sub-material quantities in kg.
Calculation Scope 3 Category 4
The scope of upstream transportation extends to shipments of material procured by all Belimo entities from external suppliers and delivered to Belimo Logistics and Customizing (L&C) locations or sub-contracted manufacturing locations. Also included in the scope are shipments sent between two Belimo locations e.g. Production location (e.g. Hinwil) to L&C locations and/or subsidiaries. Furthermore, outbound transportation and distribution services purchased by Belimo are included in category 4 meaning all finished goods customer shipments originating from a Belimo location for which Belimo is organizing and paying the transportation cost. Also included in scope are return shipments sent at Belimo’s cost from customers. Excluded are any orders whereby a customer collects or arranges transportation themselves (accounting in Scope 3 category 9). Scope 3 Category 4 emissions from upstream transportation and distribution are calculated based on the total weight of shipments. Belimo follows the GLEC framework v3.0, which is ISO14083 compliant. The GLEC framework is based on the “well-to-wheel” (WTW) concept. The calculation was performed by ecotransit (certified).
Calculation Scope 3 Category 5
The emission calculation related to the waste generated in production / logistics & customization (P/L&C) is based on the waste management input data obtained from the sustainability reporting system. Weight-based EFs are applied. Waste per waste type and treatment type is collected at the P/L&C level. Waste types from hazardous and non-hazardous sources are reported. The EFs per waste type and waste treatment are extracted from the LCA database or Defra. The weight of waste per waste type and waste treatment is multiplied by the corresponding EF (kg CO2e / kg).
Calculation Scope 3 Category 6
The entities in the calculation scope cover more than 80% of the total expenditure for Belimo’s business travel and include Switzerland, the United States, Hong Kong, China, and Canada. For emissions generated through employee business travel by air, rail, and road, a hybrid (distance- and spend-based) approach is applied. Business air travel is based on flight reports from external providers, and the calculation is performed by myclimate following a distance-based (passenger kilometer) approach. EFs are applied by myclimate based on flight class and distance characteristics. Business travel by train, car, and taxi is based on expenditure data following a spend-based approach.
Calculation Scope 3 Category 7
The GHG emissions associated with employee commuting are estimated based on headcounts (HCs) and follow a distance-based approach. Belimo has run an employee survey on commuting behavior for Hinwil (HQ) and all Asia Pacific entities. The survey outcome was extrapolated based on the HC reported in the corporate reporting system. Americas and EMEA entities performed a separate assessment of the commuting distance per employee (HC) and assumed all employees commute to work by car. The percentage of time in home offices was estimated based on job profile. Distance-based EFs by Defra are applied. In line with the requirements of WBSCD sector guidance, 440 trips to work per reporting year (2 ways per day * 220 days) and the use of diesel as fuel are assumed.
Calculation Scope 3 Category 11
The emissions related to the use-phase of Belimo’s sold products are driven by the energy consumption over the products’ lifetime and calculated based on technical performance data available for products sold. Technical performance data on the product type level includes energy consumption in operation and in standby mode, cycle running time (actuators), and number of cycles per day (actuators). Based on those parameters and the assumption of a 15-year average lifetime per product, the total lifetime energy consumption (kWh) of sold product types per country is derived. EFs from IEA in kg CO2e / kWh are applied at the country level. The Scope 3 Category 11 calculation is based on the technical product specifications that are defined, maintained and verified by Belimo. Supplier information is not required.
Calculation Scope 3 Category 12
Emissions from end-of-life treatment of sold products are calculated using a weight approach. Statistics published by the OECD on waste treatment scenarios in different geographical regions (EMEA, AM, and APAC) are applied. Each product category is allocated to its waste type (how the entire product is defined as waste by EWC). Statistics on waste treatment scenarios (incineration, recycling, landfill in %) are provided by the OECD and extracted per waste type and geographical region (EMEA, AM, and APAC). Relevant EFs in kg CO2e / kg waste are taken from Defra and ecoinvent and applied at the level of products sold per region.
Rationale for omissions of Scope 3 emissions categories (GRI 303-5 a,d)
Rationale for omissions of Scope 3 emissions categories (GRI 303-5 a,d)
Scope / Category | Description | Rationale for Omission | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Category 2: Capital goods | Emissions associated with the production, transportation, and end-of-life treatment of long-term assets such as machinery, equipment, and buildings that the Company purchases and uses in its own operations. | Compared to the Company's highest emissions sources in Cat 1 and Cat 11, Cat 2 is not considered to be relevant. | ||
Category 3: Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities | Emissions associated with the production, processing, and transportation of fuels and energy that the Company consumes, but which are not accounted for in Scope 1 (direct) or Scope 2 (purchased electricity) emissions. | Compared to the Company's highest emissions sources in Cat 1 and Cat 11, Cat 3 is not considered to be relevant. | ||
Category 8: Upstream leased assets | Emissions from the operation of assets leased but not owned or controlled by the Company. | Compared to the Company's highest emissions sources in Cat 1 and Cat 11, Cat 8 is not considered to be relevant. | ||
Category 9: Downstream Transportation and Distribution | Emissions resulting from the transportation and distribution of the Company's sold products to end customers or retailers via vehicles and facilities not owned or controlled by the Company. | Based on a shipment analysis, less than 3% of Belimo’s outbound shipments to customers are paid by third parties / customers. Therefore Scope 3 category 9 is not considered material and therefore not subject to reporting and disclosure. | ||
Category 10: Processing of Sold Products | Emissions generated when the Company sells intermediate products that are further processed or transformed by a third party before reaching the end consumer. | Compared to the Company's highest emissions sources in Cat 1 and Cat 11, Cat 10 is not considered to be relevant. Not applicable to the Company's business model. | ||
Category 13: Downstream Leased Assets | Emissions resulting from the operation of assets that the Company owns but leases to other entities, where the Company is the lessor and maintains financial control but not operational control over the asset's use. | Compared to the Company's highest emissions sources in Cat 1 and Cat 11, Cat 13 is not considered to be relevant. Not applicable to the Company's business model. | ||
Category 14: Franchises | Emissions resulting from franchise operations not owned or controlled by the Company but operated under its brand. | Compared to the Company's highest emissions sources in Cat 1 and Cat 11, Cat 14 is not considered to be relevant. Not applicable to the Company's business model. | ||
Category 15: Investments | Emissions resulting from the Company's investments and lending activities, also known as financed emissions. | Compared to the Company's highest emissions sources in Cat 1 and Cat 11, Cat 15 is not considered to be relevant. Not applicable to the Company's business model. |
Emission factors (GRI 305-1 e, GRI 305-2 e. GRI 305-3 f)
The applied methodology ensures that up-to-date EFs from internationally recognized sources are used.
Emission factors (GRI 305-1 e, GRI 305-2 e. GRI 305-3 f)
Scope / Category | Activity Data | EF Dataset | Reasoning for EF Application | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scope 1 | • Stationary: P/L&C entity environmental reporting • Mobile: Corporate reporting system (expenditure report) | • Stationary: EPA 2023 • Mobile: Helmholtz 2023 | Standard source for Scope 1 EFs (third-party verified) | |||
Scope 2 | • Stationary: P/L&C entity environmental reporting | • IEA 2023 | Standard source for electricity EFs at country level (location-based) | |||
Scope 3 Category 1 | • Corporate procurement database | • ecoinvent version 3.9.1 (2023) | ecoinvent EFs allow material group-specific allocation based on weight per sub-material group | |||
Scope 3 Category 4 | • Corporate procurement database | • GLEC Framework v3.0 | State-of-the-art GLEC framework v3.0; EFs derived from fuel source and vehicle type | |||
Scope 3 Category 5 | • Stationary: P/L&C entity environmental reporting | • DEFRA UK 2023 • ecoinvent version 3.9.1 (2023) | Conservative, hybrid approach applied: actual emissions reflected as accurately as possible with conservative EFs from datasets | |||
Scope 3 Category 6 | • Corporate reporting system (expenditure report) | • Mobitool 2023 • Helmholtz 2023 • Myclimate 2023 | • Mobitool – country-specific for Switzerland • Helmholtz – widely accepted EFs used as standard • myclimate – widely accepted | |||
Scope 3 Category 7 | • Corporate reporting system (HC report) | • DEFRA UK 2023 | Conservative approach, widely used coefficients | |||
Scope 3 Category 11 | • Corporate reporting system (products sold) • Technical product data | • IEA 2023 | Country-specific EFs for electricity mix applicable for energy consumption per products sold on country level | |||
Scope 3 Category 12 | • Corporate reporting system (products sold) • Technical product data | • DEFRA UK 2023 • ecoinvent version 3.9.1 (2023) | Conservative, hybrid approach applied: actual emissions reflected as accurately as possible with conservative EFs from either DEFRA or ecoinvent |
Quality of GHG inventory
Quality of GHG inventory
Scope / Category | Accuracy | Regionality | Completeness | Reliability | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scope 1 | Widely accepted and applied EF sources available (country- specific) | Geographical representation of all P/L&C entities in EMEA, AM, and APAC | Complete data on energy consumption for all P/L&C entities | High reliability due to invoices (evidence documents) | ||||
Scope 2 | Widely accepted and applied EF sources available (country- specific) | Geographical representation of all P/L&C entities in EMEA, AM, and APAC | Complete data on energy consumption for all P/L&C entities | High reliability due to invoices (evidence documents) | ||||
Scope 3 Category 1 | EFs from secondary data sources cannot be obtained for all sub-materials: The EFs have been approximated with those of similar materials | No geographic representation | Data on article weights in the procurement report is not complete. However, 95% is available | Although the weight- based approach is considered less specific than sup- plier-specific data, it is preferred over the spend-based approach | ||||
Scope 3 Category 4 | Following the GLEC framework v3.0 | Distance approach based on geographical data on shipments | Weight data available per shipment: Order weights displayed in SAP order data are “net” and do not include packaging. An increase of the net weight by 12% is assumed for an estimated packed weight | Weight data and shipment details with medium to high reliability | ||||
Scope 3 Category 5 | Widely accepted and applied EF sources. If no matching EFs were available for waste type and treatment, proxies were applied | Geographical representation of all P/L&C entities in EMEA, AM, and APAC, but no country-specific waste EFs available | Complete data on waste generation for all P/L&C entities | High reliability due to invoices (evidence documents) | ||||
Scope 3 Category 6 | EFs for business air travel are provided by an external partner (myclimate); for business travel (road and rail), country-specific EFs are applied | CH, US, HK, CN, and CA | Data collection is limited to entities with material business travel occurrence (CH, US, HK, CN, and CA) | Expenditure data from corporate reporting system with high reliability | ||||
Scope 3 Category 7 | EFs for commuting by train, car, and bus from an internationally recognized source | Geographic representation of all P/L&C entities and subsidiaries in EMEA, AM, and APAC | Survey response rate for Hinwil (HQ) and APAC can be increased; Complete data collection / analysis for EMEA and AM | Extrapolation based on HC report from corporate reporting system with high reliability; Assumption on commuting mode and home office | ||||
Scope 3 Category 11 | EFs from a widely applicable and internationally recognized source | Geographic representation obtained through sales per country data and EF application | Energy consumption data of all AB products is covered (> 95%) | Technical performance data is of high quality if available. However, some data gaps are present (C articles) and approximated with average data | ||||
Scope 3 Category 12 | Widely accepted and applied EF sources. If no matching EFs were available for waste type and treatment, proxies were applied | Geographical representation obtained through sales per regional data (AM, AP, and EMEA), but no country-specific waste statistics were applied | Weight data of all AB products is covered (> 95%) | Weight data of products sold is of high quality if available. However, some data gaps are present (C articles) and approximated with average data |
Energy Management
Conversion factors (GRI 302-1 f, g)
The conversion factors applied to any of the indicators disclosed in the Energy Management chapter are indicated, along with the source of these factors:
Conversion factors (GRI 302-1 f, g)
Fuel type | From | To | Multiple Times | Source | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heating oil Diesel Gasoline | US Gallon | Liter | 3.7854 | Energy conversion calculators - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) | ||||
Heating oil Diesel | Liter | MWh | 0.01 | Einheiten-Umrechner für verschiedene Heizenergie – Energie-Umwelt.ch | ||||
Natural gas | ccf | MWh | 0.0299 | |||||
Natural gas | m3 | MWh | 0.0106 | |||||
Natural gas | Therms | MWh | 0.0293 | |||||
Floor space | ft2 | m2 | 0.0929 |
Our Employees
Diversity (GRI 405-1)
Definition Management Level: When disclosing diversity indicators, a distinction is made between three employee categories: Executive Committee, Employee with management function and Employee without management function.
Employees (GRI 2-7)
Definition Employee: An employee is an individual who is in an employment relationship with the organization according to national law or practice.
Definition Contract and Employment Types: Definitions of permanent, temporary, full-time, and part-time employees vary across countries where the Group operates. To calculate country-level data, the Group applied the respective national legal definitions. These figures were then aggregated to determine total numbers, without standardizing for cross-country differences.
Temporary employees are primarily engaged to manage production peaks or support specific temporary projects. In some regions and functions, it is standard practice to offer a temporary or a temporary agency contract before extending an offer of permanent employment at Belimo.
Unadjusted Gender Pay Gap (GRI 405-2)
Definition Unadjusted: The unadjusted gender pay gap is the percentage difference in average remuneration between women and men, based on men’s average pay, without considering factors such as job role, experience, tenure, performance, or other characteristics that may influence compensation. It is calculated by comparing the average earnings of all female employees to those of all male employees across the organization.
To calculate the Unadjusted Pay Gap, the following methodology was applied:
- Remuneration Basis: The calculation includes basic salary and additional pay components such as variable compensation for the performance year 2025 (bonuses, incentives, awards), allowances of all types, and any other comparable remuneration components. For variable compensation elements payable after the reporting year, accrued amounts were considered.
- Annualization and FTE Adjustment: All amounts were annualized and converted to full-time equivalent values to ensure comparability across employees.
- Exclusions: Payments for overtime, benefits, and pension-related contributions were excluded from the calculation. Employees hired during the reporting year who were not eligible for bonus payments (typically those starting on or after October 1) were fully excluded.
Definition Employee Categories: When disclosing the unadjusted gender pay gap, a distinction is made between the three employee categories senior management, middle management and staff.
- Senior Management: Senior Management shapes long-term strategies and ensures business sustainability, balancing vision with execution while focusing on corporate governance and global impact. They lead major business functions and initiatives with an emphasis on strategy and growth, while also contributing expert knowledge and insights to influence critical decisions. They navigate complex organizational challenges, drive high-impact initiatives, and provide subject matter expertise to shape long-term outcomes across the organization.
- Middle Management: Middle management translates organizational strategy into operational plans and drives results within their area of responsibility, leading teams, departments, or smaller regional or functional units. They combine deep expertise with leadership, setting strategy, defining objectives, and providing directional guidance while also contributing hands-on knowledge to complex problems, processes, or Company-wide initiatives.
- Staff: Staff deliver operational results and contribute to organizational objectives, applying their expertise and skills to ensure quality, reliability, and efficiency. They execute tasks and initiatives with precision, support processes, and collaborate effectively across teams to solve problems and meet business or customer needs. By applying judgment and knowledge within their area of responsibility, they drive consistent outcomes, support continuous improvement, and contribute to the success of their teams and the broader organization.
To ensure equal pay for equal work, Belimo consistently monitors its remuneration system:
- Salaries and bonus payments are benchmarked against market standards and adjusted as needed.
- The internal remuneration system is reviewed for potential gender pay gaps, particularly during the annual salary review process.
- Equal pay practices for the Swiss entities are evaluated using the official “Logib” tool of the Swiss Confederation.
Occupational Health, Safety & Wellbeing
Injury Disclosures
Definition Work-related Injuries: Injuries that occurred due to work-related activities, regardless of severity. Injuries must be classified as work-related if they result from events or exposures in the work environment. Includes all types of injuries (e.g., cuts, fractures, burns) that require medical attention or result in lost work time.
Definition High-consequence Work-related Injuries: These are injuries that result in permanent disability, excluding fatality. A high-consequence work-related injury is one from which a worker cannot recover to their pre-injury health status within six months. This results in long-term, permanent or severe effects on the worker's physical condition. It excludes minor injuries and focuses on those with long-term impact.
Definition Lost-time Injuries: A lost-time injury results in absence from work for at least one day.
Main Type of Work-related Injuries:
- Fractures and broken bones – often resulting from falls, collisions, or heavy machinery.
- Cuts and lacerations – caused by sharp tools, equipment, or materials.
- Burns – due to exposure to heat, chemicals, or electricity.
- Sprains and strains – commonly from lifting, repetitive motion, or slips.
- Concussions or head injuries – from falling objects or accidents.
- Crush injuries – involving heavy equipment or materials.
- Hearing loss – from prolonged exposure to high noise levels.
- Respiratory issues – due to inhalation of hazardous substances.
- Eye injuries – from chemicals, particles, or radiation.
- Occupational diseases – such as skin conditions or musculoskeletal disorders.
Definition Recordable Injury Rate: The overall injury rate is calculated based on recordable cases relative to hours worked, ensuring transparency in performance monitoring. Each incident, where merited, was thoroughly investigated to identify root causes and implement corrective actions. Our proactive approach includes ergonomic improvements, enhanced machine guarding, targeted safety training, and continuous engagement with employees to strengthen hazard awareness and prevention measures.
Definition Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate: The LTIFR is calculated based on number of lost-time injuries per 200 000 hours worked. All FTEs working at P/L&C sites are covered in the calculation.
Hours worked and incidents are derived from a questionnaire completed by our subsidiaries, and no estimates were used; only confirmed cases are included. Rates are normalized per 200 000 hours worked to ensure comparability across reporting periods.